Donate
Independent, objective, nonpartisan research

Eventbriefing Collegepathways1117

Database

This is the content currently stored in the post and postmeta tables.

View live version

object(Timber\Post)#3742 (44) { ["ImageClass"]=> string(12) "Timber\Image" ["PostClass"]=> string(11) "Timber\Post" ["TermClass"]=> string(11) "Timber\Term" ["object_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["custom"]=> array(5) { ["_wp_attached_file"]=> string(37) "eventbriefing_collegepathways1117.pdf" ["wpmf_size"]=> string(6) "343997" ["wpmf_filetype"]=> string(3) "pdf" ["wpmf_order"]=> string(1) "0" ["searchwp_content"]=> string(4181) "Improving College Pathways in California November 28, 2017 Niu Gao and Hans Johnson This event is supported with funding from the James Irvine Foundation and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The research is supported with funding from the Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation, the Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund, the James Irvine Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, and the Sutton Family Fund. Too few California high school students complete college  Across demographic groups, demand for college is very strong  But 70 percent of California 9th graders will not earn a bachelor’s degree  Lack of progression on the college pathway is a problem at every stage – Last two years of high school and first two of college are critical  More improvements are needed for underrepresented groups 2 Most students do not finish a-g course sequences in high school  Only 20 percent of the high school graduates in our sample completed a–g sequences  Completion rates lower among students historically underrepresented in higher education  Math and English are critical to a–g completion – Just 36 percent completed English requirements with a C or better – 42 percent completed math requirements with a C or better  Grades 11 and 12 are key exit points from a–g courses 3 Even well-prepared students do not progress % of students Share of students who progress to the next a–g math course 100% 80% 60% Among students passing previous math course Among students passing previous math course with an A or B 66% 69% 59% 68% 47% 59% 40% 20% 0% Algebra I to geometry Geometry to algebra 2 Algebra 2 to higher math 4 Progression problems leave underrepresented students farther behind Share of students progressing to the next level a–g math course 100% Asian American African American 80% 80% 74% 64% 60% 66% 40% 20% 52% 38% 0% Algebra 1 to geometry Geometry to algebra 2 Algebra 2 to higher math 5 In college, high school preparation is key  Remedial education is one the largest roadblocks to student success at community college  Taking a–g courses in high school reduces students’ likelihood of taking remedial courses – Grades in and number of a–g courses matter a lot 6 Among prepared students, placement is a concern Share of well-prepared community college students placed in remedial courses 40% % of students 30% 20% 21% 15% 21% 13% 18% 19% 17% 14% 10% 0% Female Male Asian African Latino American American White Low First Income Generation 7 CSU capacity is a problem Number of eligible students denied admission 30,000 CC Transfers First time freshmen # of denied eligibles 25,000 20,000 15,000 14,343 16,447 19,024 19,406 10,000 5,000 0 8,215 2013 10,252 2014 8,792 2015 8,149 2016 8 Persistence in the first two years at CSU is critical Share of students who drop out of CSU 60% 50% Total (5 years) First 2 years 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Female Male African American Latino Asian American White 9 Policy recommendations  Increase the number of a–g approved courses  Update high school graduation requirements  Develop better placement systems – Consider “nudges” in high schools – Incorporate high school records in community college  Establish more effective academic counseling and support systems  Expand access to CSU and UC  Establish a statewide longitudinal K–20 database 10 Improving College Pathways in California November 28, 2017 Niu Gao and Hans Johnson This event is supported with funding from the James Irvine Foundation and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The research is supported with funding from the Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation, the Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund, the James Irvine Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, and the Sutton Family Fund. Notes on the use of these slides These slides were created to accompany a presentation. They do not include full documentation of sources, data samples, methods, and interpretations. To avoid misinterpretations, please contact: Niu Gao (gao@ppic.org; 415-291-4491) Thank you for your interest in this work. 12" } ["___content":protected]=> string(152) "

Eventbriefing Collegepathways1117

" ["_permalink":protected]=> string(99) "https://www.ppic.org/event/improving-college-pathways-california/eventbriefing_collegepathways1117/" ["_next":protected]=> array(0) { } ["_prev":protected]=> array(0) { } ["_css_class":protected]=> NULL ["id"]=> int(12744) ["ID"]=> int(12744) ["post_author"]=> string(1) "9" ["post_content"]=> string(0) "" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2017-11-28 09:02:40" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(12400) ["post_status"]=> string(7) "inherit" ["post_title"]=> string(33) "Eventbriefing Collegepathways1117" ["post_type"]=> string(10) "attachment" ["slug"]=> string(33) "eventbriefing_collegepathways1117" ["__type":protected]=> NULL ["_wp_attached_file"]=> string(37) "eventbriefing_collegepathways1117.pdf" ["wpmf_size"]=> string(6) "343997" ["wpmf_filetype"]=> string(3) "pdf" ["wpmf_order"]=> string(1) "0" ["searchwp_content"]=> string(4181) "Improving College Pathways in California November 28, 2017 Niu Gao and Hans Johnson This event is supported with funding from the James Irvine Foundation and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The research is supported with funding from the Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation, the Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund, the James Irvine Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, and the Sutton Family Fund. Too few California high school students complete college  Across demographic groups, demand for college is very strong  But 70 percent of California 9th graders will not earn a bachelor’s degree  Lack of progression on the college pathway is a problem at every stage – Last two years of high school and first two of college are critical  More improvements are needed for underrepresented groups 2 Most students do not finish a-g course sequences in high school  Only 20 percent of the high school graduates in our sample completed a–g sequences  Completion rates lower among students historically underrepresented in higher education  Math and English are critical to a–g completion – Just 36 percent completed English requirements with a C or better – 42 percent completed math requirements with a C or better  Grades 11 and 12 are key exit points from a–g courses 3 Even well-prepared students do not progress % of students Share of students who progress to the next a–g math course 100% 80% 60% Among students passing previous math course Among students passing previous math course with an A or B 66% 69% 59% 68% 47% 59% 40% 20% 0% Algebra I to geometry Geometry to algebra 2 Algebra 2 to higher math 4 Progression problems leave underrepresented students farther behind Share of students progressing to the next level a–g math course 100% Asian American African American 80% 80% 74% 64% 60% 66% 40% 20% 52% 38% 0% Algebra 1 to geometry Geometry to algebra 2 Algebra 2 to higher math 5 In college, high school preparation is key  Remedial education is one the largest roadblocks to student success at community college  Taking a–g courses in high school reduces students’ likelihood of taking remedial courses – Grades in and number of a–g courses matter a lot 6 Among prepared students, placement is a concern Share of well-prepared community college students placed in remedial courses 40% % of students 30% 20% 21% 15% 21% 13% 18% 19% 17% 14% 10% 0% Female Male Asian African Latino American American White Low First Income Generation 7 CSU capacity is a problem Number of eligible students denied admission 30,000 CC Transfers First time freshmen # of denied eligibles 25,000 20,000 15,000 14,343 16,447 19,024 19,406 10,000 5,000 0 8,215 2013 10,252 2014 8,792 2015 8,149 2016 8 Persistence in the first two years at CSU is critical Share of students who drop out of CSU 60% 50% Total (5 years) First 2 years 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Female Male African American Latino Asian American White 9 Policy recommendations  Increase the number of a–g approved courses  Update high school graduation requirements  Develop better placement systems – Consider “nudges” in high schools – Incorporate high school records in community college  Establish more effective academic counseling and support systems  Expand access to CSU and UC  Establish a statewide longitudinal K–20 database 10 Improving College Pathways in California November 28, 2017 Niu Gao and Hans Johnson This event is supported with funding from the James Irvine Foundation and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The research is supported with funding from the Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation, the Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund, the James Irvine Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, and the Sutton Family Fund. Notes on the use of these slides These slides were created to accompany a presentation. They do not include full documentation of sources, data samples, methods, and interpretations. To avoid misinterpretations, please contact: Niu Gao (gao@ppic.org; 415-291-4491) Thank you for your interest in this work. 12" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2017-11-28 17:02:40" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(6) "closed" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(33) "eventbriefing_collegepathways1117" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2017-11-28 09:02:40" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2017-11-28 17:02:40" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["guid"]=> string(76) "http://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/eventbriefing_collegepathways1117.pdf" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_mime_type"]=> string(15) "application/pdf" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" ["status"]=> string(7) "inherit" ["attachment_authors"]=> bool(false) }