Event Briefing Improving Outcomes For English Learners
Database
This is the content currently stored in the post and postmeta tables.
object(Timber\Post)#3711 (44) {
["ImageClass"]=>
string(12) "Timber\Image"
["PostClass"]=>
string(11) "Timber\Post"
["TermClass"]=>
string(11) "Timber\Term"
["object_type"]=>
string(4) "post"
["custom"]=>
array(5) {
["_wp_attached_file"]=>
string(62) "eventbriefing_improving-outcomes-for-english-learners-0518.pdf"
["wpmf_size"]=>
string(6) "387609"
["wpmf_filetype"]=>
string(3) "pdf"
["wpmf_order"]=>
string(1) "0"
["searchwp_content"]=>
string(3329) "K–12 Reforms and California’s English Learner Achievement Gap May 31, 2018 Laura Hill English Learner students are California’s future 1.3 million English Learner (EL) students – 21% of K‒12 students – 38% including former ELs EL status is meant to be temporary – Assessed at school entry – Provided with services and supports to improve English proficiency – Reclassified as English proficient according to criteria set by district (with state guidance) 2 Most of the state’s ELs speak Spanish at home Cantonese, 1% Arabic, 1% Filipino, 1% Mandarin, 1% Vietnamese, 2% Other, 9% Spanish, 83% 3 EL students live in almost every county 4 Some students take many years to reclassify Ever EL (in thousands) 200 150 100 50 0 KN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Grade Source: CDE, 2016–17 school year. Reclassified Long-term EL EL 4–5 years EL 0–3 years 5 Reclassified ELs are among the state’s strongest performers % met standard 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ELA Source: CDE Smarter Balanced Assessment Results, 2016–17 school year. Math EL Reclassified English only 6 ELs are affected by new academic standards and tests Common Core State Standards – ELA and math standards require more language skills than old standards – Smarter Balanced assessment reflects this; students not scoring as well English Language Development standards – Align with new Common Core standards – New assessment (ELPAC) this year English Learner Roadmap will help implement and link 7 EL reclassification is in flux Reclassification rate is 13% Reclassification decision is based on: – English proficiency (CELDT ELPAC) – Basic skills in English (CST SBAC) – Teacher and parent recommendations Reclassification policy should be uniform across districts – Keep same basic criteria, using SBAC and ELPAC? – Use fewer criteria – just the ELPAC? – Allow multiple measures – Should criteria vary by grade level or type of EL? 8 Reforms are intended to support EL progress Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) directs funding to EL (and other high-need students) Local Control and Accountability Plans – Establish priorities and goals – Explain how funds support goals, emphasis on high-need students Prop 58 (bilingual education) To monitor the impact of reforms, need to track spending and how it is helping students succeed 9 Accountability efforts require good data District and school dashboards – Allow parents to assess annual data – Will include all statewide and district-specific priorities State has made some data improvements – Reporting Smarter Balanced scores for “ever-ELs” – Counts of long-term ELs and of students at risk of becoming long-term ELs Using existing K‒12 data to track student progress over time would be a tremendous improvement – Better still would be linking to post-secondary data 10 K–12 Reforms and California’s English Learner Achievement Gap May 31, 2018 Laura Hill Notes on the use of these slides These slides were created to accompany a presentation. They do not include full documentation of sources, data samples, methods, and interpretations. To avoid misinterpretations, please contact: Laura Hill (hill@ppic.org; 415-291-4424) Thank you for your interest in this work. 12"
}
["___content":protected]=>
string(198) "
"
["_permalink":protected]=>
string(122) "https://www.ppic.org/event/improving-outcomes-english-learners/eventbriefing_improving-outcomes-for-english-learners-0518/"
["_next":protected]=>
array(0) {
}
["_prev":protected]=>
array(0) {
}
["_css_class":protected]=>
NULL
["id"]=>
int(15074)
["ID"]=>
int(15074)
["post_author"]=>
string(1) "4"
["post_content"]=>
string(0) ""
["post_date"]=>
string(19) "2018-05-31 11:10:32"
["post_excerpt"]=>
string(0) ""
["post_parent"]=>
int(14713)
["post_status"]=>
string(7) "inherit"
["post_title"]=>
string(54) "Event Briefing Improving Outcomes For English Learners"
["post_type"]=>
string(10) "attachment"
["slug"]=>
string(58) "eventbriefing_improving-outcomes-for-english-learners-0518"
["__type":protected]=>
NULL
["_wp_attached_file"]=>
string(62) "eventbriefing_improving-outcomes-for-english-learners-0518.pdf"
["wpmf_size"]=>
string(6) "387609"
["wpmf_filetype"]=>
string(3) "pdf"
["wpmf_order"]=>
string(1) "0"
["searchwp_content"]=>
string(3329) "K–12 Reforms and California’s English Learner Achievement Gap May 31, 2018 Laura Hill English Learner students are California’s future 1.3 million English Learner (EL) students – 21% of K‒12 students – 38% including former ELs EL status is meant to be temporary – Assessed at school entry – Provided with services and supports to improve English proficiency – Reclassified as English proficient according to criteria set by district (with state guidance) 2 Most of the state’s ELs speak Spanish at home Cantonese, 1% Arabic, 1% Filipino, 1% Mandarin, 1% Vietnamese, 2% Other, 9% Spanish, 83% 3 EL students live in almost every county 4 Some students take many years to reclassify Ever EL (in thousands) 200 150 100 50 0 KN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Grade Source: CDE, 2016–17 school year. Reclassified Long-term EL EL 4–5 years EL 0–3 years 5 Reclassified ELs are among the state’s strongest performers % met standard 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ELA Source: CDE Smarter Balanced Assessment Results, 2016–17 school year. Math EL Reclassified English only 6 ELs are affected by new academic standards and tests Common Core State Standards – ELA and math standards require more language skills than old standards – Smarter Balanced assessment reflects this; students not scoring as well English Language Development standards – Align with new Common Core standards – New assessment (ELPAC) this year English Learner Roadmap will help implement and link 7 EL reclassification is in flux Reclassification rate is 13% Reclassification decision is based on: – English proficiency (CELDT ELPAC) – Basic skills in English (CST SBAC) – Teacher and parent recommendations Reclassification policy should be uniform across districts – Keep same basic criteria, using SBAC and ELPAC? – Use fewer criteria – just the ELPAC? – Allow multiple measures – Should criteria vary by grade level or type of EL? 8 Reforms are intended to support EL progress Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) directs funding to EL (and other high-need students) Local Control and Accountability Plans – Establish priorities and goals – Explain how funds support goals, emphasis on high-need students Prop 58 (bilingual education) To monitor the impact of reforms, need to track spending and how it is helping students succeed 9 Accountability efforts require good data District and school dashboards – Allow parents to assess annual data – Will include all statewide and district-specific priorities State has made some data improvements – Reporting Smarter Balanced scores for “ever-ELs” – Counts of long-term ELs and of students at risk of becoming long-term ELs Using existing K‒12 data to track student progress over time would be a tremendous improvement – Better still would be linking to post-secondary data 10 K–12 Reforms and California’s English Learner Achievement Gap May 31, 2018 Laura Hill Notes on the use of these slides These slides were created to accompany a presentation. They do not include full documentation of sources, data samples, methods, and interpretations. To avoid misinterpretations, please contact: Laura Hill (hill@ppic.org; 415-291-4424) Thank you for your interest in this work. 12"
["post_date_gmt"]=>
string(19) "2018-05-31 18:10:32"
["comment_status"]=>
string(4) "open"
["ping_status"]=>
string(6) "closed"
["post_password"]=>
string(0) ""
["post_name"]=>
string(58) "eventbriefing_improving-outcomes-for-english-learners-0518"
["to_ping"]=>
string(0) ""
["pinged"]=>
string(0) ""
["post_modified"]=>
string(19) "2018-05-31 11:10:45"
["post_modified_gmt"]=>
string(19) "2018-05-31 18:10:45"
["post_content_filtered"]=>
string(0) ""
["guid"]=>
string(101) "http://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/eventbriefing_improving-outcomes-for-english-learners-0518.pdf"
["menu_order"]=>
int(0)
["post_mime_type"]=>
string(15) "application/pdf"
["comment_count"]=>
string(1) "0"
["filter"]=>
string(3) "raw"
["status"]=>
string(7) "inherit"
["attachment_authors"]=>
bool(false)
}