Donate
Independent, objective, nonpartisan research

JTF CaliforniansAndTransportationJTF

Database

This is the content currently stored in the post and postmeta tables.

View live version

object(Timber\Post)#3711 (44) { ["ImageClass"]=> string(12) "Timber\Image" ["PostClass"]=> string(11) "Timber\Post" ["TermClass"]=> string(11) "Timber\Term" ["object_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["custom"]=> array(5) { ["_wp_attached_file"]=> string(40) "JTF_CaliforniansAndTransportationJTF.pdf" ["wpmf_size"]=> string(5) "88747" ["wpmf_filetype"]=> string(3) "pdf" ["wpmf_order"]=> string(1) "0" ["searchwp_content"]=> string(5716) "PPIC.ORG Californians and Transportation Mark Baldassare, Dean Bonner, David Kordus, and Lunna Lopes  Californians view traffic congestion as a big problem in most regions. In PPIC’s March 2016 Statewide Survey, a majority of the state’s residents (58%) said traffic congestio n on freeways and major roads was a big problem in their region. More than 6 in 10 r esidents across all regions except for the Central Valley (36%) said tra ffic congestion w as a big problem. When asked which transportation projects should be given top priority for additional state funding, Californians said either public bus and transit (34%) or freeways and highways (33%). Fewer said local streets and roads (24%) or carpool lanes (6%) . According to PPIC surveys, most working Californians say they usually commute by driving alone.  Most Californians say spending more on roads, highways, and bridges i s very important. In his 2017 –18 budg et, Governor Brown has proposed about $43 billion of additional spending for state and local transportation projects over the next 10 years , with a focus on repair ing and maint aining roads, highways, bridges, and public transit. In PPIC’s January 2017 Stat ewide Survey, majorities of Californians across parties and regions say that spending more money on California's roads, highways, and bridges is very important for the future quality of life and economic vitality of the state. Among all adults, 6 1% say thi s is very important, compared to 62% in March 2016 and 53% in March 2015. However, on ly 41% of adults and 43 % of likely voters support the governor ’s budget proposal for transportation infrastructure after hearing a description of his plan, which includes a new $65 vehicle fee and an increase in the state’s gasoline and diesel excise tax es.  A solid majority support a state bond to fund surface transportation … Sixt y-five percent of adults and 60 % of likely voters say they would vote for a bond measure on th e state ballot to pay for surface transportation projects. While majorities of Democrats and independents would vote yes, 54 % of Republicans would vote no. Regionally, support for a state bond measure to fund surface transportation projects is highest i n Los Ang eles County (70%) and the San Francisco Bay Area (69%) , followed by Orange/San Diego Counties (64%), the Inland Empire (62%) , and the Central Valley (61%).  … b ut there is less support for increasing local sales tax es to pay for transportation projects. About half of adults and likely voters say they would vote for an increase in their local sales tax to fund local transportation projects, far short of the two -thirds majority required to pass. Support in each region falls below the two -thirds ne eded. There are notable partisan differences on this issue , with 6 3% of De mocrats and 52% of independents saying they would vote for a local sales tax to fund surface transportation projects, while only 33% of Republicans say the same .  Fewer than half favor lowering the vote requirement for local taxes that fund transportation. Only 47 % of Californ ians and slightly fewer likely voters (41 %) say they would vote for a measure on the state ballot to replace the two -thirds vote requirement with a 55 % majority to pass local sales taxes for roads and surface transportation projects . Support for such a measure fal ls short of 50% across all regions except for the I nland Empire (50%) . Across parties, a majority of Democrats say they would vote yes on a measure lowering the vote requirement , while a majority of independents and Republicans would vote no. Latinos (5 8%) are the most likely to favor replacing the two -thirds vote requirement with a 55% majority for p assing local taxes, followed by Asian Americans (52 %), African Americans (47%) , and whites (37 %).  Few Californians prefer more funding alone as a way to significantly improve roads and surface transportation . When asked what is needed to significantly im prove the state’s roads, only 7 % say increasing the amount of state funding alone is needed. Half of adults say that wise use of exi sting funds is needed, while 40% say that both more funding and better use of existing funds are needed to significantly imp rove the state’s surface transportation. A st rong majority of Republicans (72 %) say only better use of existing funds is needed, compared to 56% of independents and fewer Democrats (41 %). FEBRUARY 2017 CALIFORNIANS AND TRANSPORTATION FEBRUARY 2017 PPIC.ORG Source: PPIC Statewide Survey, January 2017 and March 2016 . Margin of error for all adults for each survey is ±3.3 to ±3.6. The margins of error for subgroups are larger. Contact : surveys@ppic.org 70 62 61 55 58 25 3432 36 33 0 20 40 60 80 100 CentralValley SF Bay Area Los Angeles Orange/ San Diego Inland Empire % Importance of surface transportation funding for California’s future Somewhat importantVery important 3752 4242 33 0 20 40 60 80 100 CentralValley SF Bay Area Los Angeles Orange/ San Diego Inland Empire % Support for Governor Brown’s 2017 –18 transportation infrastructure budget proposal 65 75 3960 60 50 63 3352 53 0 20 40 60 80 All adults DemRep IndLikely voters % Support for surface transportation funding measures State bond Local sales tax 47 54 25 43 41 0 20 4060 All adults Dem Rep Ind Likely voters % Support for lowering vote requirement toa 55% majority for local sales taxes for transportation Use existing funds more wisely , 51% Increase amount of state funding , 7% Increase funding and use funds more wisely , 40% Don’t know , 2% Funding preferences to significantly improve the quality of California’s surface transportation" } ["___content":protected]=> string(158) "

JTF CaliforniansAndTransportationJTF

" ["_permalink":protected]=> string(102) "https://www.ppic.org/publication/californians-and-transportation/jtf_californiansandtransportationjtf/" ["_next":protected]=> array(0) { } ["_prev":protected]=> array(0) { } ["_css_class":protected]=> NULL ["id"]=> int(9017) ["ID"]=> int(9017) ["post_author"]=> string(1) "1" ["post_content"]=> string(0) "" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 02:43:04" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(4563) ["post_status"]=> string(7) "inherit" ["post_title"]=> string(36) "JTF CaliforniansAndTransportationJTF" ["post_type"]=> string(10) "attachment" ["slug"]=> string(36) "jtf_californiansandtransportationjtf" ["__type":protected]=> NULL ["_wp_attached_file"]=> string(40) "JTF_CaliforniansAndTransportationJTF.pdf" ["wpmf_size"]=> string(5) "88747" ["wpmf_filetype"]=> string(3) "pdf" ["wpmf_order"]=> string(1) "0" ["searchwp_content"]=> string(5716) "PPIC.ORG Californians and Transportation Mark Baldassare, Dean Bonner, David Kordus, and Lunna Lopes  Californians view traffic congestion as a big problem in most regions. In PPIC’s March 2016 Statewide Survey, a majority of the state’s residents (58%) said traffic congestio n on freeways and major roads was a big problem in their region. More than 6 in 10 r esidents across all regions except for the Central Valley (36%) said tra ffic congestion w as a big problem. When asked which transportation projects should be given top priority for additional state funding, Californians said either public bus and transit (34%) or freeways and highways (33%). Fewer said local streets and roads (24%) or carpool lanes (6%) . According to PPIC surveys, most working Californians say they usually commute by driving alone.  Most Californians say spending more on roads, highways, and bridges i s very important. In his 2017 –18 budg et, Governor Brown has proposed about $43 billion of additional spending for state and local transportation projects over the next 10 years , with a focus on repair ing and maint aining roads, highways, bridges, and public transit. In PPIC’s January 2017 Stat ewide Survey, majorities of Californians across parties and regions say that spending more money on California's roads, highways, and bridges is very important for the future quality of life and economic vitality of the state. Among all adults, 6 1% say thi s is very important, compared to 62% in March 2016 and 53% in March 2015. However, on ly 41% of adults and 43 % of likely voters support the governor ’s budget proposal for transportation infrastructure after hearing a description of his plan, which includes a new $65 vehicle fee and an increase in the state’s gasoline and diesel excise tax es.  A solid majority support a state bond to fund surface transportation … Sixt y-five percent of adults and 60 % of likely voters say they would vote for a bond measure on th e state ballot to pay for surface transportation projects. While majorities of Democrats and independents would vote yes, 54 % of Republicans would vote no. Regionally, support for a state bond measure to fund surface transportation projects is highest i n Los Ang eles County (70%) and the San Francisco Bay Area (69%) , followed by Orange/San Diego Counties (64%), the Inland Empire (62%) , and the Central Valley (61%).  … b ut there is less support for increasing local sales tax es to pay for transportation projects. About half of adults and likely voters say they would vote for an increase in their local sales tax to fund local transportation projects, far short of the two -thirds majority required to pass. Support in each region falls below the two -thirds ne eded. There are notable partisan differences on this issue , with 6 3% of De mocrats and 52% of independents saying they would vote for a local sales tax to fund surface transportation projects, while only 33% of Republicans say the same .  Fewer than half favor lowering the vote requirement for local taxes that fund transportation. Only 47 % of Californ ians and slightly fewer likely voters (41 %) say they would vote for a measure on the state ballot to replace the two -thirds vote requirement with a 55 % majority to pass local sales taxes for roads and surface transportation projects . Support for such a measure fal ls short of 50% across all regions except for the I nland Empire (50%) . Across parties, a majority of Democrats say they would vote yes on a measure lowering the vote requirement , while a majority of independents and Republicans would vote no. Latinos (5 8%) are the most likely to favor replacing the two -thirds vote requirement with a 55% majority for p assing local taxes, followed by Asian Americans (52 %), African Americans (47%) , and whites (37 %).  Few Californians prefer more funding alone as a way to significantly improve roads and surface transportation . When asked what is needed to significantly im prove the state’s roads, only 7 % say increasing the amount of state funding alone is needed. Half of adults say that wise use of exi sting funds is needed, while 40% say that both more funding and better use of existing funds are needed to significantly imp rove the state’s surface transportation. A st rong majority of Republicans (72 %) say only better use of existing funds is needed, compared to 56% of independents and fewer Democrats (41 %). FEBRUARY 2017 CALIFORNIANS AND TRANSPORTATION FEBRUARY 2017 PPIC.ORG Source: PPIC Statewide Survey, January 2017 and March 2016 . Margin of error for all adults for each survey is ±3.3 to ±3.6. The margins of error for subgroups are larger. Contact : surveys@ppic.org 70 62 61 55 58 25 3432 36 33 0 20 40 60 80 100 CentralValley SF Bay Area Los Angeles Orange/ San Diego Inland Empire % Importance of surface transportation funding for California’s future Somewhat importantVery important 3752 4242 33 0 20 40 60 80 100 CentralValley SF Bay Area Los Angeles Orange/ San Diego Inland Empire % Support for Governor Brown’s 2017 –18 transportation infrastructure budget proposal 65 75 3960 60 50 63 3352 53 0 20 40 60 80 All adults DemRep IndLikely voters % Support for surface transportation funding measures State bond Local sales tax 47 54 25 43 41 0 20 4060 All adults Dem Rep Ind Likely voters % Support for lowering vote requirement toa 55% majority for local sales taxes for transportation Use existing funds more wisely , 51% Increase amount of state funding , 7% Increase funding and use funds more wisely , 40% Don’t know , 2% Funding preferences to significantly improve the quality of California’s surface transportation" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 09:43:04" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(6) "closed" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(36) "jtf_californiansandtransportationjtf" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 02:43:04" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 09:43:04" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["guid"]=> string(78) "http://148.62.4.17/wp-content/uploads/JTF_CaliforniansAndTransportationJTF.pdf" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_mime_type"]=> string(15) "application/pdf" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" ["status"]=> string(7) "inherit" ["attachment_authors"]=> bool(false) }