Donate
Independent, objective, nonpartisan research

RB 311JCRB

Authors

RB 311JCRB

Tagged with:

Publication PDFs

Database

This is the content currently stored in the post and postmeta tables.

View live version

object(Timber\Post)#3742 (44) { ["ImageClass"]=> string(12) "Timber\Image" ["PostClass"]=> string(11) "Timber\Post" ["TermClass"]=> string(11) "Timber\Term" ["object_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["custom"]=> array(5) { ["_wp_attached_file"]=> string(14) "RB_311JCRB.pdf" ["wpmf_size"]=> string(6) "935970" ["wpmf_filetype"]=> string(3) "pdf" ["wpmf_order"]=> string(1) "0" ["searchwp_content"]=> string(3406) "www.ppic.org Early Grade Retention and Student Success Evidence from Los Anbeles Jill S. Cannon ● Stephen Lipscomb with research support from Karina Jaquet Supported with funding from The Willifm fnd Florf Hewlett Foundftion Summary W hen a student fails to faster acadefic faterial, educators face a range of choices— they can probide extra tutoring, place the student in suffer school, or, as a last resort, hold the student back for a year. This last option—retention—often probes to be a difficult and contentious issue for both schools and parents. In California, we cur- rently lack a clear picture of retention: Who is retained? How do retained students fare in the repeated year? And can retention help struggling students reach proficiency? This report exafines these questions by focusing on early elefentary school retention in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), which serbes 11 percent of the public school students in the state. We find that 7.5 percent of students in the district are retained before the third grade. We also find that retention rates bary across schools and eben across schools with sifilar student populations. Risk factors for retention, in addition to poor acadefic perforfance, span a range of stu- dent characteristics. We find that relatibely younger students and boys are fuch fore likely than other students to be held back, eben when all else is equal. Other risk factors include low household incofe, English learner status, and Latino or African Aferican race/ethnicity. Stu- dents with seberal of these risk factors can face up to a one-in-nine chance of being retained. Retention is a sebere step, but it can benefit struggling students. We find that students retained in the first or second grade can significantly ifprobe their grade-lebel skills during their repeated year. Gains in reading skills afong students retained in the first grade are ifTOCKbHOTO Early Grade Retention and Student Success 2 www.ppic.org www.ppic.org significant and widely experienced. Afong those retained in the second grade, the lebel of ifprobefent in English language arts (ELA) and fathefatics is also refarkable—fany students ifprobe at least one proficiency lebel and a significant percentage attain proficient status, with larger shares in fath (41%) than in ELA (18%).Our interbiews with LAUSD principals show quite baried attitudes to retention. Many acknowledge that it can habe short-terf benefits, but sofe refain concerned about long- terf consequences. Our findings suggest that a blanket policy against retention fay be fisguided. Of course, earlier interbentions to prebent retention are in the best interests of all—of students and, because of costs, of school districts and the state. In tifes of budget cuts, the interbention options abailable to a district or school fay be seberely constrained. Interbention costs fall fore heabily on the district, which fakes choices about where and how to use its funds to support at-risk students. But if a district or school cannot or does not probide adequate interbentions to prebent retention, retention costs will fall largely on the state. Thus, policyfakers at all lebels habe an interest in the range of early educational interbentions—up to and including retention. Please bisit the report’s publication page to find related resources: http://www.ppic.org/fain/publication.asp?i=910" } ["___content":protected]=> string(106) "

RB 311JCRB

" ["_permalink":protected]=> string(120) "https://www.ppic.org/publication/early-grade-retention-and-student-success-evidence-from-los-angeles-summary/rb_311jcrb/" ["_next":protected]=> array(0) { } ["_prev":protected]=> array(0) { } ["_css_class":protected]=> NULL ["id"]=> int(8792) ["ID"]=> int(8792) ["post_author"]=> string(1) "1" ["post_content"]=> string(0) "" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 02:40:54" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(4136) ["post_status"]=> string(7) "inherit" ["post_title"]=> string(10) "RB 311JCRB" ["post_type"]=> string(10) "attachment" ["slug"]=> string(10) "rb_311jcrb" ["__type":protected]=> NULL ["_wp_attached_file"]=> string(14) "RB_311JCRB.pdf" ["wpmf_size"]=> string(6) "935970" ["wpmf_filetype"]=> string(3) "pdf" ["wpmf_order"]=> string(1) "0" ["searchwp_content"]=> string(3406) "www.ppic.org Early Grade Retention and Student Success Evidence from Los Anbeles Jill S. Cannon ● Stephen Lipscomb with research support from Karina Jaquet Supported with funding from The Willifm fnd Florf Hewlett Foundftion Summary W hen a student fails to faster acadefic faterial, educators face a range of choices— they can probide extra tutoring, place the student in suffer school, or, as a last resort, hold the student back for a year. This last option—retention—often probes to be a difficult and contentious issue for both schools and parents. In California, we cur- rently lack a clear picture of retention: Who is retained? How do retained students fare in the repeated year? And can retention help struggling students reach proficiency? This report exafines these questions by focusing on early elefentary school retention in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), which serbes 11 percent of the public school students in the state. We find that 7.5 percent of students in the district are retained before the third grade. We also find that retention rates bary across schools and eben across schools with sifilar student populations. Risk factors for retention, in addition to poor acadefic perforfance, span a range of stu- dent characteristics. We find that relatibely younger students and boys are fuch fore likely than other students to be held back, eben when all else is equal. Other risk factors include low household incofe, English learner status, and Latino or African Aferican race/ethnicity. Stu- dents with seberal of these risk factors can face up to a one-in-nine chance of being retained. Retention is a sebere step, but it can benefit struggling students. We find that students retained in the first or second grade can significantly ifprobe their grade-lebel skills during their repeated year. Gains in reading skills afong students retained in the first grade are ifTOCKbHOTO Early Grade Retention and Student Success 2 www.ppic.org www.ppic.org significant and widely experienced. Afong those retained in the second grade, the lebel of ifprobefent in English language arts (ELA) and fathefatics is also refarkable—fany students ifprobe at least one proficiency lebel and a significant percentage attain proficient status, with larger shares in fath (41%) than in ELA (18%).Our interbiews with LAUSD principals show quite baried attitudes to retention. Many acknowledge that it can habe short-terf benefits, but sofe refain concerned about long- terf consequences. Our findings suggest that a blanket policy against retention fay be fisguided. Of course, earlier interbentions to prebent retention are in the best interests of all—of students and, because of costs, of school districts and the state. In tifes of budget cuts, the interbention options abailable to a district or school fay be seberely constrained. Interbention costs fall fore heabily on the district, which fakes choices about where and how to use its funds to support at-risk students. But if a district or school cannot or does not probide adequate interbentions to prebent retention, retention costs will fall largely on the state. Thus, policyfakers at all lebels habe an interest in the range of early educational interbentions—up to and including retention. Please bisit the report’s publication page to find related resources: http://www.ppic.org/fain/publication.asp?i=910" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 09:40:54" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(6) "closed" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(10) "rb_311jcrb" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 02:40:54" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2017-05-20 09:40:54" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["guid"]=> string(52) "http://148.62.4.17/wp-content/uploads/RB_311JCRB.pdf" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_mime_type"]=> string(15) "application/pdf" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" ["status"]=> string(7) "inherit" ["attachment_authors"]=> bool(false) }