Donate
PPIC Logo Independent, objective, nonpartisan research

Search Results

Filters Sort by:
Report

Financing Higher Education Capital Projects

By Patrick Murphy, Radhika Mehlotra, Kevin Cook

Aging infrastructure should be a major priority as California seeks to produce more college-educated workers. Modernizing and maintaining facilities at the state’s community colleges, CSU, and UC could cost billions of dollars, with each system facing its own unique challenges.

blog post

Bricks and Mortarboards: Capital Investment in Colleges

By Patrick Murphy, Kevin Cook, Radhika Mehlotra

California needs to rethink its higher education capital finance strategy—a key component in maintaining access for all students and producing an educated workforce.

Report

Upgrading Technology Infrastructure in California’s Schools

By Patrick Murphy, Niu Gao

As California schools move into online testing and online learning, an adequate technology infrastructure is no longer an option, but a necessity. To fully benefit from digital learning, schools will require a comprehensive technology infrastructure that can support a range of administrative and instructional tools. An earlier PPIC report found that most schools need significant technology upgrades in order to accommodate online learning. What upgrades do schools need most, and how much will they cost? How can policymakers help ensure that all students have access to 21st-century learning tools?

This report describes findings based on new statewide data. First, schools need high-density wireless networks, increased bandwidth, and overall network infrastructure upgrades. The challenges are greater in large schools, mostly because of the high cost of wireless networks for large groups of users. Second, IT staffing continues to be an issue in most schools. Only a third of schools have staff onsite to support desktop and local network configuration.

To estimate the costs of upgrading technology infrastructure, we created two scenarios. Our baseline scenario—which includes minimum bandwidth for digital learning, one device for every two middle- and high-school students, and one IT staffer for every 300 computing devices—would cost an additional $1.5 billion over the next three years. Our target scenario—which involves additional bandwidth and one device to every middle- and high-school student—would cost significantly more: $3.8 billion. In either scenario, staffing costs are more than 60 percent of the total.

As the state explores ways to address these ongoing technology needs, we offer several recommendations. First, continue and maintain sustained funding for technology investment, particularly for staffing. Second, provide targeted technical assistance to address severe staffing problems. Third, to ensure that all students have full access to digital learning, take advantage of federal funding and explore innovative partnerships with private sector to cover the cost of home broadband access for students from lower-income families.

blog post

Video: Bridging California’s Digital Divide

By Vicki Hsieh

How can unprecedented public investments in broadband be leveraged to close the digital divide? PPIC convened a series of three expert panels to explore how California can ensure equity in internet access as well as in the use of digital connectivity.

Report

The Future of Higher Education Enrollment in California

By Hans Johnson, Cesar Alesi Perez

College enrollment and completion have long trended upward in California, but enrollment declined during the pandemic. What might the state’s colleges and universities expect in the future? While California’s population is expected to grow very slowly, rising rates of college readiness among high school graduates will drive increases in enrollment over the next decade.

Report

Making Room for the Future: Rebuilding California’s Infrastructure

By David E. Dowall, Jan Whittington

This report identifies the state’s most pressing infrastructure problems and shows how policymakers can address them more effectively. In particular, it analyzes the issues and opportunities confronting three of the state’s major infrastructure responsibilities-education, water, and transportation-and identifies a range of policy tools that can be used to improve infrastructure service delivery. After surveying the key institutions in each sector, the authors offer a list of recommendations for addressing the state’s infrastructure challenges. They also suggest a three-step approach to implementing these recommendations: immediate measures to relieve costly congestion and infrastructure impaction; near-term efforts to address infrastructure service shortfalls; and a long-term overhaul to remove structural and institutional impediments to infrastructure provision.

blog post

Spending on Corrections and Higher Education

By Sonya Tafoya, Sarah Bohn

California spends more on corrections and less on higher education today, in relative terms, than at nearly any point in the past thirty years.

Report

California’s Infrastructure Policy for the 21st Century: Issues and Opportunities

By David E. Dowall

Although California will need to invest an estimated $82 billion in its infrastructure over the next decade, projected state and local revenue sources will meet only half of this need.  In California’s Infrastructure Policy for the 21st Century: Issues and Opportunities, David Dowall offers market-oriented solutions to this problem.  He urges policymakers to concentrate on management rather than the direct provision of infrastructure; to prioritize needs by focusing on how much the public is willing to pay for them; and to manage demand in such areas as energy, transportation, and water supply.  Even as the state fosters demand-oriented competition, however, it must ensure that all households and businesses have access to high-quality infrastructure services at fair prices.

Policy Brief

Policy Brief: COVID-19 Emergency Funding and California’s Higher Education Systems

By Jacob Jackson, Kevin Cook, Darriya Starr, Chansonette Buck

Just before the pandemic hit, state funding for higher education was high and increasing, student outcomes were improving, and programs for students in need were robust. COVID-19 sent shocking changes through these educational institutions’ means and methods of operating.

Search results are limited to 100 items. Please use the Refine Results tool if you are not finding what you are looking for.