Donate
PPIC Logo Independent, objective, nonpartisan research

Search Results

Filters Sort by:
blog post

Solutions for the Delta

By Caitrin Chappelle

Decision makers need actionable science to address the many difficult challenges facing the Delta.

blog post

Changing Attitudes toward Marijuana Legalization

By David Kordus

Since the 2010 election—when a measure to legalize marijuana failed—the PPIC Statewide Survey has found increased support for legalization within key groups.

blog post

“Sin” Taxes on the Ballot This Fall

By Patrick Murphy, Talib Jabbar

Two "sin” taxes on the November ballot could together bring in more than $2 billion in state revenue annually.

blog post

Regulating Marijuana as a Crop

By Patrick Murphy, Van Butsic

How will legalizing marijuana affect California’s water and the environment?

blog post

Video: Lessons on Marijuana Regulation

By Linda Strean

Regulators from Washington and Colorado told a Sacramento audience that California should start planning now to determine the information that would be needed to regulate recreational marijuana.

event

Regulating Marijuana in California

About the Program
If Californians vote to legalize recreational marijuana in November, what kind of regulatory framework would best accommodate the state's differing policy goals? And what can we learn from the experiences of Colorado and Washington, the first two states to legalize recreational marijuana? PPIC research director Patrick Murphy will provide an overview of a new report that addresses these questions, and a panel of experts will discuss the challenges of marijuana legalization.

There is no charge to attend and lunch will be provided.

This event has reached capacity. Please join us for the live webcast.

Report

Regulating Marijuana in California

By Patrick Murphy, John Carnevale

If California legalizes recreational marijuana, the state should develop a single highly regulated marijuana market—for medical and recreational uses. Key policy goals will also need to be addressed—including limiting the illegal market, protecting public health and safety, and raising revenue for the state

Report

Public Safety Realignment: Impacts So Far

By Magnus Lofstrom, Brandon Martin

Prompted by a federal court order to reduce prison overcrowding, California’s 2011 historic public safety realignment shifted many correctional responsibilities for lower-level felons from the state to counties. The reform was premised on the idea that locals can do a better job, and it was hoped that incarceration rates and corrections costs would fall. At the same time, critics predicted crime would rise. Four years since its implementation, realignment has made several important impacts:

  • Realignment significantly reduced the prison population, but the state did not reach the court-mandated population target until after the passage of Proposition 47 in November 2014, which reduced penalties for many property and drug offenses.
  • The reform challenged county jails and probation departments by making them responsible for a greater number of offenders with a broader range of backgrounds and needs.
  • The county jail population did not rise nearly as much as the prison population fell, reducing the total number of people incarcerated in California.
  • Realignment did not increase violent crime, but auto thefts rose.
  • Research so far shows no dramatic change in recidivism rates.
  • State corrections spending remains high, but there is reason to believe expenditures could drop in the future.

Realignment has largely been successful, but the state and county correctional systems face significant challenges. The state needs to regain control of prison medical care, which is now in the hands of a federal receiver. And the state and counties together must make progress in reducing stubbornly high recidivism rates.

Search results are limited to 100 items. Please use the Refine Results tool if you are not finding what you are looking for.